Hochatown vs Broken Bow Proper: Where the Cabin STR Economy Actually Lives

Quick answer

Across 5 engine fixtures, Hochatown produces a 26.4% median reclassification ratio versus 23.0% for the rest of Broken Bow. The difference comes from land allocation: Hochatown's land share runs higher because of resort-tier or sub-market-specific land scarcity.

In absolute dollars, however, Hochatown properties typically produce larger Y1 federal savings because purchase prices run higher — even with a lower reclass percentage, the absolute basis is larger.

Side-by-side per-fixture

Property	Sub-market	Price	Reclass %	Y1 fed savings @ 37%	Land %
Hochatown New-Build Cabin SFR · STR	Hochatown	$495,000	26.5%	$41,393	14.6%
Beavers Bend Forest Cabin SFR · STR	Beavers Bend State Park corridor	$565,000	26.2%	$47,236	13.7%
Mountain Fork Riverfront SFR · STR	Mountain Fork River corridor	$545,000	26.1%	$44,678	15.1%
Hochatown Premium Cabin SFR · STR	Hochatown	$725,000	26.3%	$61,292	13.2%
Broken Bow Town SFR LTR SFR	Broken Bow proper	$325,000	16.8%	$17,594	12.9%

What's the same

• Tax law. Both sub-markets are in Oklahoma, subject to the same state conformity rules: Oklahoma partially decouples from federal §168(k) — the state historically allowed only 80% of federal bonus depreciation, with the 20% remainder added back on the Oklahoma return. For 2025+ acquisitions under OBBBA's 100% federal bonus, the practical effect is that roughly 20% of the federal bonus deduction is added back to your Oklahoma taxable income in Year 1 and depreciated on the regular MACRS schedule for state purposes. Net effect on a typical Broken Bow cabin owner: the headline federal-savings figure overstates total tax savings by 1–2 percentage points of the accelerated reclassification amount.
• Federal §168(k) bonus depreciation. 100% under OBBBA, permanently restored for 2025+ acquisitions.
• MACRS classification methodology. Same Rev. Proc. 87-56 asset class life assignments regardless of sub-market.
• Engine methodology. Same RSMeans 2024 base costs, same BLS PPI time index, same geo factor (these are city-level, not sub-market-level).

What's different

• Land allocation. Hochatown typically runs higher on land allocation because of either resort-tier land scarcity premiums or proximity-to-amenity scarcity. This compresses depreciable basis as a percentage of purchase, even though absolute basis is larger.
• Property archetype mix. Hochatown concentrates in higher-end vacation rental product, while the broader Broken Bow market includes more off-market SFRs and longer-tail product.
• HOA capital assessment patterns. Resort-tier HOAs in Hochatown often levy special assessments for infrastructure (snowmelt, lift access, parking decks). Those assessments add to depreciable basis but distort the per-fixture cost-seg picture if the buyer doesn't separate base purchase from assessments paid.
• STR economics. Different ADR (average daily rate) profiles and material-participation friction.

Which is better for cost-seg ROI?

It depends on what "better" means.

If you measure ROI as Year-1 federal savings dollars: Hochatown wins on absolute dollars (higher purchase prices = larger absolute deductions). If you measure ROI as savings-per-dollar-of-purchase: the broader Broken Bow non-resort sub-markets typically win (lower land allocation = more depreciable basis as % of price).

For most buyers, the more useful question is: which sub-market matches my buy-box? If you're already buying $2M+ resort-tier product, the cost-seg differential is a rounding error against your decision drivers. If you're price-shopping across sub-markets and considering both, the broader Broken Bow non-resort areas produce more reclassification per dollar.

Full data with downloadable CSV/PDF   Run your property through the engine